Warning: file_get_contents(http://ip-api.com/json/3.141.37.110): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in /var/www/html/nri.connectmyindia.com/index.php on line 29

Warning: Attempt to read property "city" on null in /var/www/html/nri.connectmyindia.com/cmicity.php on line 36

Warning: Attempt to read property "region" on null in /var/www/html/nri.connectmyindia.com/cmicity.php on line 37

Warning: Attempt to read property "countryCode" on null in /var/www/html/nri.connectmyindia.com/cmicity.php on line 38
A bill limiting emergency censorship powers is opposed by the governor

A bill limiting emergency censorship powers is opposed by the governor

  Honolulu  0 Comments
A bill limiting emergency censorship powers is opposed by the governor

Several local organizations, including media watchdogs, a TV and radio trade group, and a nonprofit advocating government transparency, have raised significant concerns about House Bill 2581. This bill, awaiting Governor Josh Green's decision in Hawaii, aims to limit the authority of governors and county mayors to suspend electronic media transmissions during emergencies. It specifically removes language from state law that permits such suspensions "to the extent permitted by or under federal law."

The Big Island Press Club supports HB 2581, arguing it would ensure public access to essential information while addressing concerns from emergency management agencies. Conversely, the Hawaii Association of Broadcasters contends that the current statute is unconstitutional, citing it as prior restraint on free speech and press freedoms protected by the First Amendment. The Public First Law Center, in a letter to Governor Green, highlights existing emergency powers already granted to Hawaii's governor, suggesting HB 2581 aims to refine these powers without diminishing their effectiveness.

Governor Green, in his June 21 veto message, emphasized the need to prevent potential abuses of electronic media during emergencies that could incite violence or terrorism. He supports legislative language that strikes a balance between communication needs and public safety but faced criticism for not proposing alternative language. The bill passed unanimously through both legislative chambers earlier this year, with advocates arguing it protects constitutional rights while ensuring public safety during crises such as the Lahaina wildfires in 2023 and the Kilauea eruption in 2018.

Comments 0
Write a comment ...
Post comment
Cancel
What happens in India?

More News & Updates » »